Blog›5 Errors That Destroy Schedules in Mining Projects
Mining

5 Errors That Destroy Schedules in Mining Projects

June 5, 2026 · 6 min read · ⛏️

Mining projects consistently overrun schedules. These 5 errors account for the majority of delays — and all are preventable.

The degradation cycle

Optimistic baseline → geology surprise → resource reallocation → cascade delay → cost overrun

  1. 1. Ignoring geological uncertainty in the baseline

    Mining schedules must build in geological contingency. Treating subsurface assumptions as certainties creates a fragile baseline that breaks at first drill core.

  2. 2. No float management

    Consuming critical path float early — then having none left for real emergencies — is the most common cause of final delivery delays.

  3. 3. Equipment procurement not on the critical path

    Long-lead equipment (crushers, conveyors, transformers) with 18-24 month lead times is often not reflected in schedule logic, creating hidden criticality.

  4. 4. Disconnected WBS and schedule

    When the WBS (cost structure) and schedule use different work packages, EVM becomes impossible and cost/schedule data diverges.

  5. 5. Progress reported without earned value

    Reporting '65% complete' without a budgeted baseline means you cannot forecast the final cost. EV measurement turns progress into a management tool.

Eliminate schedule errors with TPLANNER

Built for mining projects: WBS, Gantt, EVM, and critical path in one platform.

Start free trial