5 Errors That Destroy Schedules in Mining Projects
June 5, 2026 · 6 min read · ⛏️
Mining projects consistently overrun schedules. These 5 errors account for the majority of delays — and all are preventable.
The degradation cycle
Optimistic baseline → geology surprise → resource reallocation → cascade delay → cost overrun
1. Ignoring geological uncertainty in the baseline
Mining schedules must build in geological contingency. Treating subsurface assumptions as certainties creates a fragile baseline that breaks at first drill core.
2. No float management
Consuming critical path float early — then having none left for real emergencies — is the most common cause of final delivery delays.
3. Equipment procurement not on the critical path
Long-lead equipment (crushers, conveyors, transformers) with 18-24 month lead times is often not reflected in schedule logic, creating hidden criticality.
4. Disconnected WBS and schedule
When the WBS (cost structure) and schedule use different work packages, EVM becomes impossible and cost/schedule data diverges.
5. Progress reported without earned value
Reporting '65% complete' without a budgeted baseline means you cannot forecast the final cost. EV measurement turns progress into a management tool.
Eliminate schedule errors with TPLANNER
Built for mining projects: WBS, Gantt, EVM, and critical path in one platform.
Start free trial